Friday, 17 September 2021

A hybrid performance prediction method for centrifugal compressors based on single-zone and two-zone models

A hybrid performance prediction method for centrifugal compressors based on single-zone and two-zone models


Abstract

High-accuracy models are essential for rapid performance estimations and reliable parameter refinements during the preliminary design of centrifugal compressors. In this paper, a hybrid performance prediction method is proposed by combining the loss models of the single-zone method and the division idea of the two-zone method. Physically-based loss models are adopted for the jet zone analysis in substitute of the empirical parameters in the two-zone method. Two additional parameters are introduced for the wake zone analysis to implicitly evaluate the loss not fully understood in the single-zone method. For these two-zone parameters, prediction models are proposed by first analyzing the dominant factors from one-dimensional level and then extracting the coefficients from diverse datasets with statistical techniques. The hybrid method is validated on four centrifugal compressors with flow coefficients ranging from 0.09 to 0.58 and pressure ratios up to 8.5. The results show that, compared with the single-zone and two-zone methods, the hybrid method provides more reliable performance predictions with higher accuracy in the whole operating range.







Centrifugal compressors are widely applied in aircraft engines and their efficiency is of paramount importance. This is why developing a high-accuracy one-dimensional performance prediction method is highly desired. Precise performance prediction or analysis enables designers to make quick assessments and necessary refinements of the geometry during the early design stages of centrifugal compressors.

The current one-dimensional performance prediction methods are divided into three categories: zero-zone, single-zone, and two-zone. The zero-zone technique is a non-dimensional map analysis method for which efficiency is predicted from empirical correlations according to non-dimensional parameters such as tip-speed, Mach Number and flow coefficient. These techniques are used in the early design stage, and for the limited inputs requirements, they only give fairly rough estimations.

The single-zone technique, which is more-geometry-based, divides the loss in the centrifugal compressors into numerous individual components and a loss model formulated for each component. Researchers have proposed several collections of loss models, but purely empirical and semi-empirical models in these collections significantly limit their application.

The two-zone technique, which is a more advanced method, has been proposed to model jet-wake flow pattern in flow analyses. However, effectiveness parameters may vary significantly with flow parameters such as Rynolds number, blockage, blade-loading, incidence, Mach number, etc. Even when the effectiveness parameters are set as constants, the lack of a detailed guideline for parameter selection forces designers to rely on their own experience. The fact that there is still no specific definition of the two zones to differentiate between the primary and secondary zone is another shortfall of the two-zone method.

In all, the two-zone method falls short of a basic guideline for parameter selection despite its upside of trying to model real flow structure with introduced parameters. The single zone method predicts the loss from basic physics, but some loss mechanisms aren’t sufficiently understood yet. This is why PhD candidates Pengcheng Xu, Liming Xuan and led by Professor Zhengping Zou from Beihang University in China developed a new hybrid performance prediction method combining the loss models of the single-zone technique and the division idea of the two-zone technique. The researchers introduced two additional parameters for wake zone analysis to specifically analyze the loss mechanisms not clearly understood in the single-zone method. Their research work is currently published in journal, Aerospace Science and Technology.

Going by the two-zone definition, the proposed hybrid system splits the flow into a jet zone and a wake zone. The authors adopted the well-understood models in the jet zone analysis as an alternative to the empirical parameters of the two-zone method. In the wake zone analysis, the researchers introduced two parameters as an alternative to the endwall loss model in the single-zone model. For the first time, the authors were able to completely define the wake zone and proposed a sensitivity analysis. They then presented the loss models for the jet zone and parameter selection guideline for the wake zone. The authors finally validated their proposed hybrid method on four centrifugal compressors and compared the results with the single and two-zone methods.

The novel hybrid method implicitly took into account the endwall loss with the two introduced wake zone parameters on the assumption that all the endwall loss was contained in the wake zone. Models for the wake zone parameter predictions were proposed by evaluating the dominant factors from one-dimensional level. The authors then extracted the coefficients from sufficient datasets using statistical methods. They found it to be convenient to update them from corresponding database when a new design feature needs to be introduced. The researchers then validated the hybrid method on four centrifugal compressors, and they were able to accurately predict both the shape and performance curves values. They reported an efficiency error of less than 1% at design points and no more than 4% at off-design points.

The findings of Pengcheng Xu and colleagues show that compared with the single-zone and two-zone methods, the proposed hybrid method gives more reliable and accurate predictions in the whole operating range.

About the author

Zhengping Zou is a tenured full professor as well as a doctoral supervisor in Research Institute of Aero-Engine and National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aero-Engine Aero-thermodynamics, School of Energy & Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.


Pengcheng Xu is a Ph.D. candidate supervised by Prof. Zhengping Zou in National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Aero-Engine Aero-thermodynamics, School of Energy & Power Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China.


Liming Xuan is a PhD student of Beihang University, following Prof. Zhengping Zou, Beijing, China. He obtained bechelor degree in thermal energy & power engineering from Harbin Institute of Technology in 2014, and master degree in power engineering from University of Shanghai for Science and Technology in 2017.



Friday, 6 August 2021

؟How to Choose an Industrial Face Mask

How to Choose an Industrial Face Mask?



The COVID crisis has highlighted the need for protective masks to fight the virus. But long before surgical masks and N95 respirators became part of our daily lives, face masks were already in daily use in the industry.

With the coronavirus pandemic and the obligation to wear filtering facepieces decreed in many countries, two families of masks have been popularized: surgical masks and FFP respirators /N95 masks.

If a surgical mask is a disposable medical device only used in the medical field, the respirators used in industry are personal protective equipment (PPE) and offer respiratory protection.

What are the different types of respirators? How do they offer protection? Which respirator for which applications? How to wear a facepiece? Our article will give you some piece of advice to help you choose the most suitable equipment for your industrial needs. We will only focus on PPE. If you want to know more about medical masks, read this article.

In the industry, filtering facepieces are mandatory for anyone working in a dusty environment with exposure to hazards (fumes, gases or other toxic substances). They protect the wearer from all particles and projections that could be inhaled and prevent him/her from harmful consequences for his health.

Insulating and Filtering Masks

Different types of industrial equipment exist, insulating masks and filtering masks. Choosing one instead of the other implies taking into consideration the type of contaminant the wearer is exposed to and the oxygen level in the work environment.

Both filtering and insulating masks offer protection against dust, gas, fumes, vapors and aerosols. While the filtering ones are equipped with filters that retain contaminants and purify the air breathed by the user, insulating masks are supplied with air that originates from an uncontaminated source. Therefore, they offer superior protection to all other masks because the user is permanently isolated from the contaminated area.




Insulating masks
are essential for long-term work in confined environments (for example in sewers), with low oxygen levels (below 17% ), or when the concentration of the contaminant is too high and the contaminant cannot be filtered.
Those full face masks protect the eyes, the nose and the mouth and can be self-contained or non-self-contained.
- With a self-contained device, the user carries an oxygen cylinder connected to the mask via a hose. The user is therefore free to move around the work area. The device does not involve a filter so the user is constrained by the duration of the cylinder’s autonomy.
- With a non-autonomous device, the user has a supply of clean air via a hose connected to a compressor located outside the polluted work area. He is therefore permanently connected to this hose and must therefore be more careful with his movements.



Filtering masks
can only be used in oxygen-rich environments (with oxygen levels above 17%) and are suitable for short-term work.
- The most famous ones are the FFP1, FFP2/N95 and FFP3 respirators.
- These single-use filtering facepieces protect against contaminants such as dust, particles or viruses with a maximum use time of 8 hours.

Wearing a respirator can be very uncomfortable (heat inside the mask, breathing resistance). Some masks are equipped with an exhalation valve that improves the user’s comfort. This valve allows air to pass through when breathing out and closes when breathing in. Particles do not penetrate the mask, but the exhaled air is not filtered and can therefore contaminate the outside environment.

The Mask Efficiency Classes


Full and Half Masks

Depending on the type of pollutants and their concentration in the work environment, the wearer can choose either a half a full mask.


Half masks
are filtering equipment that protects the respiratory tract (nose, mouth and chin) without compromising the field of vision. They are effective against dust and particles and are sufficient in environments that are not hazardous to the eyes.
- Soft silicone half-masks are reusable, offer comfort to the user and can be worn for long periods.
- Lighter, disposable half-masks contain neither latex nor silicone but allow the user, thanks to their low nasal position, to wear safety glasses for example.



Full face masks
protect the nose, mouth and chin and in addition cover the eye area. They are recommended when there is a risk for the eyes as they guarantee a good seal and maximum protection for the operator.

They are effective against toxic gases, fumes and vapors in oxygen-rich (full-face filtering masks) and oxygen-poor (full-face insulating masks) work environments.
- Single-filter full-face masks are made of elastomer or silicone. Some models are equipped with a panoramic screen for a better field of vision.
- Double-filter full-face masks are equipped with a double air filter system with a valve that allows air to escape better. This provides greater comfort for the user and also prevents fogging.

 Full face masks are widely used in the chemical, pharmaceutical, automotive and gas industries.



Whether you choose a full-face mask or a half-face mask, you will have to choose the right filters. There are 3 types of filters: gas filters, particulate filters and combination filters.
1- Gas filters protect against toxic vapors, gases and chemicals.
2- Particle filters protect against dust, smoke, steam, microorganisms and viruses.
3- Combination filters combine the characteristics of gas and particle filters and are required, for                example, to protect against aerosols and vapors.


What are the Standards?

Respirators are tested in the direction of inspiration (from outside to inside). The tests take into account the efficiency of the filter and leakage to the face.


In Europe, they must meet the European standard EN 149: 2001 which has three classes of disposable particulate respirators (FFP1, FFP2 and FFP3).


1-FFP1 refers to the least filtering of the three masks with an aerosol filtration of at least 80% and leakage to the inside of maximum 22%. This mask is mainly used as a dust mask (home renovations and various types of work).
2- FFP2 masks have a minimum of 94% filtration percentage and maximum 8% leakage to the inside. They are mainly used in construction, agriculture, and by healthcare professionals against influenza viruses.
3-  FFP3 masks are the most filtering mask of the FFPs. With a minimum filtration percentage of 99% and maximum 2% leakage to the inside, they protect against very fine particles such as asbestos.

In the United States, respirators must meet NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health) standards. Within this standard, there are several classes of respirators depending on the degree of oil resistance:
1- Class N: no oil resistance. A distinction is made between N95, N99 and N100. The number after the letter indicates the percentage of filtration of suspended particles.
2- Class R: mask resistant to oil for up to eight hours. Here again, a distinction is made between R95, R99 and R100.
3- Class P: a completely oil-resistant mask.

How to Wear a Face Mask? The Importance of Fit Testing 



Filters are essential to ensure a respirator offers the right protection and filtration efficiency. But that is not all. A face mask must also be worn correctly to guarantee full protection and minimum leakage. When badly worn, even the best respirator becomes meaningless.

Fit testers are here to make sure that respirators fit well on a person. American company TSI manufactures quality instruments among which is the PortaCount Respirator Fit Tester 8040. Last year, we spoke with Oliver F. Bischof, Director of Sales – EMEA at TSI: 

Many countries follow standards that demand that everybody who wears a respirator for work has to be fit tested. In the United States and in the United Kingdom, every operator who needs to wear a respirator for work has to be fit tested. In France and in the Netherlands, only the people working in the asbestos removal and cleanup industries have to be fit tested.

Thursday, 5 August 2021

Road vehicles - Hydraulic jacks - Specifications IS0 11530

Road vehicles - Hydraulic jacks
Specifications
IS0 11530


Scope
This International Standard specifies design and safety requirements, and test methods for hydraulic
jacks for road vehicles, used for changing wheels and putting on chains.


Tuesday, 3 August 2021

Jacks, Industrial Rollers, Air Casters, and Hydraulic Gantries ASME B30.1-2015

Jacks, Industrial
Rollers, Air Casters,
and Hydraulic Gantries
ASME B30.1-2015

SCOPE
The ASME B30 Standard contains provisions thatapply to the construction, installation, operation, inspection, testing, maintenance, and use of cranes and other lifting and material-movement related equipment. For the convenience of the reader, the Standard has been
 divided into separate volumes. Each volume has been written under the direction of the ASME B30 Standard Committee and has successfully completed a consensus approval process under the general auspices of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).



Friday, 16 July 2021

How hydraulic jack work

How hydraulic jack work

What is a Hydraulic Jack? How does a bottle jack work: laws of hydrostatics